ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
In-hospital outcomes and cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among younger patients: a double/debiased machine learning approach using electronic health records in Germany.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is increasing with population aging. Although surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has traditionally been the standard treatment, transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) is increasingly used. The optimal treatment for patients aged 60-75 remains debated.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 28,805 German patients who underwent isolated SAVR or TF-TAVR (2018-2022). We applied double/debiased machine learning estimators that combined adaptive lasso variable selection with propensity score-based weighting across 21 baseline characteristics. Cost-effectiveness was assessed via incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves from in-hospital and 1-year perspectives.
resultsCompared with SAVR, TF-TAVR was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality (causal risk ratio [RR] 0.65; p = 0.012), along with lower rates of bleeding (RR 0.29; p < 0.001), postoperative delirium (RR 0.32; p < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation > 48 h (RR 0.39; p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in acute kidney injury rates (RR 0.89; p = 0.150). However, reimbursement was substantially higher for TF-TAVR (€7071 more per case, p < 0.001). A hypothetical shift from SAVR to TF-TAVR was associated with an ICER of €857,413 (95% CI €472,195-€4,310,651) from the in-hospital perspective and €196,422 (95% CI €123,873-€457,813) from the 1-year perspective. Notably, unadjusted analyses indicated a narrowing cost gap over time: Reimbursement for TF-TAVR decreased by approximately 12% between 2018 and 2022, while SAVR costs remained stable. Consequently, TF-TAVR is becoming increasingly cost-effective.
conclusionGiven an estimated life expectancy of 11 to 25 years in this population, the incremental costs per life saved associated with a hypothetical shift from SAVR to TF-TAVR appear justifiable. Nonetheless, individual patient circumstances must always be considered in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.