ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Relationship between the estrus duration in cyclic mares and the endometrial gene expression on day 7 post-ovulation.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of estrus duration on endometrial gene expression in cyclic mares on Day 7 post-ovulation, focusing on transcripts relevant to early pregnancy: uterocalin (P19), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), progesterone receptor (PGR), and estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1). Twelve mares were classified according to the estrus duration in long estrus (LE, ≥ 3 days of endometrial edema; n = 7) or short estrus (SE, < 3 days, n = 5). Transcervical endometrial biopsies were collected and gene expression quantified via qPCR. The only significant difference between groups was found in P19 expression, which was elevated in LE mares (P = 0.048). No differences were observed for IGF1, PGR or FGF2 (P > 0.1). ESR1 expression was undetectable in all samples. These findings suggest that prolonged estrus enhances P19 expression, potentially improving uterine support for the embryo; however, other genes involved in uterine receptivity appear unaffected by estrus duration at this time point. These findings highlight P19 as a potential indicator of uterine priming and suggest that minor differences in estrous expression may be resolved by the mid‑luteal phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.