Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973142›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2026

An interpretable machine learning tool for rheumatoid arthritis screening: integrating novel cellular morphological parameters with routine blood count indices.

Lan You, Xin Li, Ruocheng Luo, Chen Peng, Qianhui Liu, Ruichun Sun, Nan Zhang, Jie Hou, Bin Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lan You *Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin Li *Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ruocheng LuoDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chen PengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qianhui LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ruichun SunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Nan ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie HouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. yangbinhx@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-3722

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372322National Natural Science Foundation of China 82572640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can cause significant disability. Early detection is vital for improving outcomes, but current diagnostic methods are costly and lack accessibility for wide-scale screening. While routine blood cell parameters are promising, novel cellular morphological indices (e.g., NE-SFL, LY-Y) remain under-explored for RA screening. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for RA screening by integrating novel morphological with routine blood parameters.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 43 blood cell parameters from 3009 participants. Feature selection used multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms, and eight predictive models were developed. Performance was evaluated on an independent test set via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Model interpretability was provided by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsSeven key predictors were identified. The XGBoost model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.929, accuracy of 0.890, sensitivity of 0.774, and specificity of 0.915 on the test set. SHAP analysis showed that novel cellular morphological parameters were the primary predictive drivers, exceeding some traditional inflammatory markers.

conclusionWe developed and validated a high-performance, interpretable ML model using blood parameters to identify individuals at high risk for RA. The results highlight the significant value of novel morphological parameters for RA screening. An accompanying online tool offers a feasible, low-cost solution for non-invasive RA screening in primary care settings. Key Points •Focus on RA screening: The model is designed specifically for screening and risk stratification of RA where timely intervention is most critical. •High performance with routine data: Using only seven readily available blood parameters, our XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.929 on an independent test set, demonstrating performance comparable to more complex or costly modalities •Translational readiness: We have operationalized this model into a freely accessible online tool, enabling immediate clinical use. This tool can serve as an efficient "pre-screening filter" in routine health checks, guiding the referral of high-risk individuals for specialist evaluation and confirmatory testing (e.g., anti-CCP, imaging). •Interpretability for clinical trust: We employed SHAP analysis to ensure model transparency, explaining both global feature importance and individual predictions. This interpretability is crucial for fostering clinician adoption and understanding the biological underpinnings of the predictions, such as the prominent role of cellular morphological parameters like LY-Y and NE-SFL.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsAdultArea Under CurveBiomarkersBlood Cell CountFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersBlood cell population parametersMachine learningRheumatoid arthritisScreeningSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41973142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.