ArticleNeuroradiology2026
3D quantitative synthetic MRI for assessing Alzheimer's clinical syndrome, subjective cognitive impairment, and mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor Alzheimer's Clinical Syndrome (ACS) and early cognitive decline (mild and subjective cognitive impairment, MCI/SCI), we used three-dimensional (3D) quantitative synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence and a T2 preparation pulse (QALAS), which can acquire quantitative parameters in a single scan, to investigate the potential of quantitative parameters to add supplemental information to the structural imaging.
methodsTwenty-four ACS patients, 19 patients with MCI/SCI, and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent MRI. The differences in longitudinal relaxation time (qT1), transverse relaxation time (qT2), proton density (PD), myelin volume fraction (MVF), and gray matter volume among the groups were evaluated using voxel-based quantification (VBQ) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Logistic regression analyses were developed to distinguish between the ACS, MCI/SCI, and HC groups.
resultsIn the VBM and VBQ analyses, patients with ACS had significantly lower gray matter volume and MVF and higher qT1, qT2, and PD compared to the HC group. Compared to VBM, VBQ analysis identified broader areas of significance specifically in the insula and cerebellum vermis, known to atrophy as the disease progresses. Subtle differences in PD and MVF were observed between MCI/SCI and HC groups, and the AUC was significantly higher when the quantitative measures obtained with 3D-QALAS were combined than when logistic regression was performed with the brain volume alone (quantitative measures and volume: 0.79; volume: 0.58; p = 0.034).
conclusions3D-QALAS integrates quantitative relaxometry and myelin-sensitive metrics reflecting water content and myelin integrity with structural information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41973103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.