Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41973071›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026

Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Among Captive Waterbird Species: Effects of Diet and Environmental Factors.

He Liu, Tingbei Bo, Jing Li, Yuekun Zhang, Huanzhi Zhou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

He LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technology, Beijing Zoo, Beijing, China.
Tingbei BoSchool of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Jing LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technology, Beijing Zoo, Beijing, China.
Yuekun ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technology, Beijing Zoo, Beijing, China.
Huanzhi ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technology, Beijing Zoo, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 5242016National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth 32200381Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 5242016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota of avian species is influenced by a diverse array of factors, encompassing host genetics, environmental conditions, physiological states, dietary patterns and age, among others. With the advent of high-throughput sequencing technology, research into avian gut microbiota has gained momentum. The artificial lake within the zoo serves as a unique nexus between the natural and captive environments. Despite this, our understanding of the gut microbiota of waterbirds residing in such an artificial habitats remains limited. In this study, we focused on three distinct species of waterbird kept in the artificial lake and traditional enclosures. We used high-throughput sequencing technology to determine the faecal microbiome of 25 waterbirds from three species, including bar-headed goose (Anser indicus), ruddy shelduck (Tadorna ferruginea) and black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis). Our objective was to elucidate the composition and community structure of their gut microbiota, while exploring the nexus between dietary habits and gut microbiota. Our findings revealed that the dietary patterns and gut microbiota of ruddy shelducks and bar-headed geese exhibited similar traits. On the other hand, black-necked cranes, whose food primarily consists of fish and meat, possessed a gut microbiota optimized for the digestion of protein and fat. Notably, artificial lakes may support higher microbial diversity compared to cage feeding. The results underscore the significance of diet as the primary determinant of gut microbiota variation among the captive waterbird. This study provides implications for promoting the healthy growth and well-being of wild waterbird in captivity.

Indexed as

BirdsDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnimals, ZooFecesartificial lakecaptivitygut microbiotawaterbirds

Identifiers

PMID41973071
PMCPMC13075262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.