ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Among Captive Waterbird Species: Effects of Diet and Environmental Factors.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiota of avian species is influenced by a diverse array of factors, encompassing host genetics, environmental conditions, physiological states, dietary patterns and age, among others. With the advent of high-throughput sequencing technology, research into avian gut microbiota has gained momentum. The artificial lake within the zoo serves as a unique nexus between the natural and captive environments. Despite this, our understanding of the gut microbiota of waterbirds residing in such an artificial habitats remains limited. In this study, we focused on three distinct species of waterbird kept in the artificial lake and traditional enclosures. We used high-throughput sequencing technology to determine the faecal microbiome of 25 waterbirds from three species, including bar-headed goose (Anser indicus), ruddy shelduck (Tadorna ferruginea) and black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis). Our objective was to elucidate the composition and community structure of their gut microbiota, while exploring the nexus between dietary habits and gut microbiota. Our findings revealed that the dietary patterns and gut microbiota of ruddy shelducks and bar-headed geese exhibited similar traits. On the other hand, black-necked cranes, whose food primarily consists of fish and meat, possessed a gut microbiota optimized for the digestion of protein and fat. Notably, artificial lakes may support higher microbial diversity compared to cage feeding. The results underscore the significance of diet as the primary determinant of gut microbiota variation among the captive waterbird. This study provides implications for promoting the healthy growth and well-being of wild waterbird in captivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.