ArticleHERD2026
Theoretical Integration for Designing Healing ICU Environments: An Interdisciplinary Framework.
Article in HERD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeThis paper presents an integrated framework combining perspectives from nursing, environmental psychology, and critical space theory. The framework is intended to support the study of materiality in ICUs and to inform future research on stakeholders' needs and guiding design interventions for more supportive, healing care environments.BackgroundIntensive care units (ICUs) are paradoxical spaces designed to save lives yet often experienced by patients as environments of dependency, disorientation, and loss of control. Materiality of the ICU environments can exacerbate stress and compromise recovery. While interventions addressing the material environment show promise in improving care experiences, existing approaches remain limited by single-theory perspectives that fail to capture the complexity of ICU materiality.MethodsThe integrated conceptual framework was developed through theory-informed synthesis guided by relevance to ICU settings and theoretical complementarity. Three established theories were synthesized-Roy's Adaptation Model, Ulrich's Theory of Supportive Design, and Lefebvre's Critical Theory on Space Production-using conceptual mapping across ontological, interactional, and interventional levels.ResultsThe analysis revealed convergent points and complementary relationships across the three theories. The integrated framework synthesizes these perspectives across three interconnected dimensions: environmental stimuli and adaptive response, spatial production and power relations, and evidence-based supportive design.ConclusionsThe integrated framework demonstrates that healing ICU environments require interdisciplinary approaches addressing interconnected biological, psychological, social, and material dimensions simultaneously. Effective interventions must target adaptive physiological needs, reduce psychological stress through supportive design, and challenge spatial power relations that marginalize patients and families. This framework provides a foundation for research and practice that empowers all care-related stakeholders to actively shape healing ICU environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.