ReviewJournal of periodontology2026
Advancing the diagnosis of peri-implant diseases: From histological foundations to next-generation ultrasonographic diagnostic markers.
Review in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing the diagnosis of peri-implant diseases: From histological foundations to next-generation ultrasonographic diagnostic markers.Journal of periodontology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis critical review provides a comprehensive analysis of the histological foundations, current clinical diagnostic standards, and emerging ultrasonographic methods for diagnosing peri-implant diseases.
methodsAn electronic search in Medline (PubMed) database was conducted to identify original and review articles focused on the histological foundation and diagnostic approaches of peri-implant diseases. This review provides an integrated perspective on the evolution of peri-implant diseases diagnostics, focusing on the clinical and radiographic criteria established by the latest consensus guidelines. It outlines the histological features of peri-implant diseases and discusses recent advancements in ultrasonographic imaging approaches for their characterization and diagnosis. This review further explores elements such as peri-implant anatomical landmarks, echo intensity, tissue perfusion, and strain elastography.
resultsHistological studies have defined the peri-implant mucosal architecture and inflammatory patterns characteristic of disease progression. While conventional diagnostics have relied on clinical examination and radiographic imaging, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) has recently emerged as a promising noninvasive imaging tool enabling detailed assessment of peri-implant tissue dimensions, echo intensity, vascular perfusion, and the extent of inflammatory involvement. Echo intensity mapping aids in the visualization and quantification of peri-implant lesions and the identification of associated bone defects. These imaging advancements not only complement current diagnostic methods but also deepen our understanding of peri-implant disease dynamics. Observed correlations between histological findings and ultrasonographic features can support the development of a new diagnostic framework incorporating HFUS-derived markers for detecting peri-implant lesions and evaluating the severity of inflammation.
conclusionsIntegrating HFUS and power Doppler imaging into peri-implant diagnostics allows real-time, noninvasive visualization of key structures such as the supracrestal adherent connective tissue, buccal bone levels, and tissue perfusion. These modalities can complement existing standards and enhance diagnostic precision by identifying the extent of peri-implant lesions and quantifying the severity of inflammation. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Peri-implant diseases can affect the tissues around dental implants and can lead to inflammation and bone loss. Understanding how these diseases develop and how best to diagnose them is essential for improving patient care. The present narrative review looked at scientific studies that examined the tissues around implants and the methods used to diagnose peri-implant diseases. It explains what researchers have learned from tissue (histological) studies and summarizes the current clinical and X-ray based diagnostic standards. It also highlights new advances in high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), a technology that can provide detailed, real-time images of the soft tissues and bone around implants without radiation. Recent studies show that HFUS can measure tissue thickness, detect inflammation, visualize blood flow, and help identify early bone defects. These ultrasound features match what is known from histology, suggesting that HFUS could become an important tool for detecting peri-implant disease earlier and more accurately. Overall, adding HFUS and power Doppler imaging to current diagnostic methods can improve the evaluation of peri-implant tissues. These noninvasive techniques can help clinicians see key structures more clearly, assess inflammation, and better understand the severity of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.