ArticleResearch in nursing & health2026
Perceptions of Patients and Health Professionals Regarding the Experience of Patients With a Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program.
Article in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (HCR), which combines supervised center-based and monitored home-based exercise programs, gained popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic. While HCR appears to be as effective as standard cardiac rehabilitation, patients' experiences within these programs remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to explore program participants' (PP) perceptions and healthcare professionals' (HP) impressions of PP' experiences with HCR. A qualitative descriptive design was used. Audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted with PP and HP, who had experience with HCR. Data were analyzed thematically. Interviews with PP (n = 16) and HP (n = 12) revealed four main themes: having fewer sessions at the center reduces accessibility barriers; going to the center provides a chance to connect with others; feeling safe in a supervised environment helps regain confidence; and going through the program supports progress through the stages of behavior change. The HCR program was perceived as convenient, primarily because it required fewer trips to the center. The program helped PP overcome feelings of social isolation, and the center was perceived as a safe environment where PP could test their physical limits. The HCR program raised awareness of their eating habits and physical activity through education. Overall, PP' experiences with HCR were positive and aligned with HP' impressions. Since PP primarily emphasized the benefits of the in-center sessions, the benefits of this component should not be overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.