Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972945›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2026

Biometric Evaluation of Baumann Skin Typing.

Shohreh Delavar, Aireza Firooz, Mansour Nassiri Kashani, Saman Ahmad Nasrollahi, Fatemeh Amiri, Taraneh Yazdanparast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shohreh DelavarCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-992X
Aireza FiroozCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-4644
Mansour Nassiri KashaniCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4944-4863
Saman Ahmad NasrollahiCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh AmiriCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Taraneh YazdanparastCenter For Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-5653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the increasing demand for personalized skincare, accurate identification of individual skin types has become essential. The Baumann skin type (BST) classification system is widely used in clinical and commercial settings, yet lacks sufficient biometric validation. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between BST categories and objective skin biophysical parameters. MATERIALS &

methodsSeventy-one healthy volunteers participated in the study. Skin parameters including stratum corneum hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin index, sebum levels, elasticity, and pH were measured using the MPA 580 system. Skin thickness and echodensity of the epidermis and dermis were assessed via high-frequency ultrasound (HFU), while depth, area, and volume of the nasolabial folds were analyzed using VisioFace CSI software. Each participant completed the BST questionnaire, and correlations between BST scores and measured skin parameters were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

resultsThe oily vs. dry score was correlated with hydration (r = 0.08, p = 0.507), TEWL (r = -0.065, p = 0.591), and sebum (r = 0.299, p = 0.011). The sensitive vs.resistant score correlated with TEWL (r = 0.388, p = 0.001) and pH (r =  0.445, p < 0.001). The pigmented vs. non-pigmented score correlated with melanin index (r =  0.280, p = 0.018). The wrinkle vs. tight score was correlated with skin firmness (R0; r = 0.495, p< 0.001), total skin elasticity (R2; r = -0.318, p = 0.007), dermal thickness (r = -0.242, p = 0.042), dermal density (r = -0.189, p = 0.115), epidermal thickness (r = -0.128, p = 0.288), nasolabial fold volume (r = 0.138, p = 0.250), surface (r = 0.150, p = 0.213), and depth (r = 0.048, p = 0.690).

conclusionThe oily vs. dry (O/D) score showed a poor but significant correlation with sebum, while hydration and TEWL were not significant. The pigmented vs. non-pigmented (P/NP) score demonstrated a poor but significant correlation with the melanin index. The sensitive vs. resistant (S/R) score showed fair and significant correlations with TEWL and pH. The wrinkle-tight (W/T) score showed fair and statistically significant correlations with elasticity parameters (R0 and R2), while correlations with nasolabial fold parameters, dermal density, and epidermal thickness were not significant; dermal thickness showed a poor but statistically significant correlation.

Indexed as

SkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaAdultBiometryElasticityEpidermisFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMelaninsMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSebumUltrasonographyWater Loss, InsensibleMelaninsbaumann skin typingbiometric assessmentskin typing

Identifiers

PMID41972945
PMCPMC13074428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.