ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Inferring Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Status From the Electronic Health Records Across Health Systems.
Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDisease activity plays a central role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical studies. The inconsistent availability of data on disease activity in real-world electronic health records (EHRs) data has limited the ability to generate real-world evidence (RWE). This study aimed to develop and validate scalable machine learning (ML) models to infer RA disease activity from EHR data.
methodsWe used EHR data from Mass General Brigham (MGB) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) linked with RA registries that prospectively collected the Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts (DAS28). Features for the algorithm were extracted from the EHRs including structured data (eg, diagnosis codes and narrative data using natural language processing [NLP]). ML models were trained on the registry-collected DAS28. The performance of models trained within the same institution and across institutions was evaluated. To assess face validity, we estimated the association between inferred disease activity and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) with stratified Cox models.
resultsWe studied 1,105 MGB and 2,631 VA patients with RA. Models with structured data achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.68 to 0.70; models incorporating structured and NLP achieved higher performance (MGB, AUC = 0.843; VA, AUC = 0.833). Cross-institution validation demonstrated limited transportability of algorithms across sites (MGB→VA, AUC = 0.679; VA→MGB, AUC = 0.718). Within the same institution, inferred disease activity was significantly associated with increased risk for incident MACEs (MGB, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.12; VA, HR = 1.14).
conclusionRA disease activity can be inferred at scale from within-institution EHR data, though cross-institution performance is limited. The inferred disease activity replicated known associations with MACEs, and the results support its use in future studies to generate RWE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.