Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972779›Full record

ReviewmBio2026

Pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension in cryptococcal meningoencephalitis.

Arie Van Wieren, Arturo Casadevall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arie Van WierenDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-5325
Arturo CasadevallDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9402-9167

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136577 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREA L COX · 2020 to 2026
$13.4M
Biology of Fungal MelaninR01AI052733 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 2003 to 2019
$6.6M
Conjugate vaccines for prevention and treatment of cryptococcosis - COVID-19 Revision SupplementR01AI152078 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 2020 to 2024
$5.1M
Exploiting antibody catalysis for treating CryptococcosisR01AI162381 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASADEVALL, ARTURO · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052733NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI152078NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162381NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis (CME) is a major cause of death and disability, and intracranial hypertension is a leading, treatable contributor to mortality and neurologic sequelae. Across CME cohorts, markedly elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure is common and often occurs despite minimal ventriculomegaly or diffuse edema on neuroimaging. This review synthesizes clinical, microbiological, imaging, pathological, and experimental evidence to define priorities for mechanistic research. Intracranial pressure (ICP) physiology predicts that once intracranial compliance is exhausted, small volume changes can produce rapid pressure increases, making CSF dynamics central to many intracranial hypertension syndromes. In CME, the frequent, rapid improvement after therapeutic CSF drainage, followed by pressure re-accumulation, supports a CSF outflow-limited mechanism for ICP. Convergent observations, including correlations between opening pressure and fungal/capsular polysaccharide burden and postmortem localization of organisms and polysaccharide at candidate CSF efflux sites, support a model of increased CSF outflow resistance. Potential modifiers include cryptococcal phenotypes (e.g., capsule size/architecture, aggregation), host immune and osmotic states, and disruption of perivascular ("glymphatic") transport that may alter clearance and compliance. Alternative dominant mechanisms (e.g., mass effect, obstructive hydrocephalus, venous sinus thrombosis, or inflammatory edema in immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome/post-infectious inflammatory response syndrome) likely account for a minority of cases but remain clinically important. Current ICP control relies on invasive CSF drainage, and empiric pharmacologic approaches have not translated well, meaning progress will depend on both clinical and basic science research that link fungal and host factors to ICP trajectories, quantify efflux-site burden, directly measure outflow resistance, and explore adjunctive therapeutics that address CSF efflux and fungal clearance.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypertensionMeningitis, CryptococcalMeningoencephalitisAnimalsHumansIntracranial Pressurecryptococcal meningitisCryptococcus neoformanshost-pathogen interactionsintracranial hypertensionintracranial pressuremycologypathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID41972779
PMCPMC13170219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.