ReviewmBio2026
Pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension in cryptococcal meningoencephalitis.
Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Disseminated Cryptococcosis Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Requiring VA-ECMO: A Case Report.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis (CME) is a major cause of death and disability, and intracranial hypertension is a leading, treatable contributor to mortality and neurologic sequelae. Across CME cohorts, markedly elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure is common and often occurs despite minimal ventriculomegaly or diffuse edema on neuroimaging. This review synthesizes clinical, microbiological, imaging, pathological, and experimental evidence to define priorities for mechanistic research. Intracranial pressure (ICP) physiology predicts that once intracranial compliance is exhausted, small volume changes can produce rapid pressure increases, making CSF dynamics central to many intracranial hypertension syndromes. In CME, the frequent, rapid improvement after therapeutic CSF drainage, followed by pressure re-accumulation, supports a CSF outflow-limited mechanism for ICP. Convergent observations, including correlations between opening pressure and fungal/capsular polysaccharide burden and postmortem localization of organisms and polysaccharide at candidate CSF efflux sites, support a model of increased CSF outflow resistance. Potential modifiers include cryptococcal phenotypes (e.g., capsule size/architecture, aggregation), host immune and osmotic states, and disruption of perivascular ("glymphatic") transport that may alter clearance and compliance. Alternative dominant mechanisms (e.g., mass effect, obstructive hydrocephalus, venous sinus thrombosis, or inflammatory edema in immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome/post-infectious inflammatory response syndrome) likely account for a minority of cases but remain clinically important. Current ICP control relies on invasive CSF drainage, and empiric pharmacologic approaches have not translated well, meaning progress will depend on both clinical and basic science research that link fungal and host factors to ICP trajectories, quantify efflux-site burden, directly measure outflow resistance, and explore adjunctive therapeutics that address CSF efflux and fungal clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.