ReviewCells2026
Dysregulation of Neutrophil-Endothelial Communication in Sepsis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biomimetic microphysiological system predicts the impact of sepsis therapeutics on neutrophil-endothelial dynamics.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Sepsis-induced immunothrombosis: from cellular crosstalk to multiple organ dysfunction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a clinical syndrome defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulation in immune response to infection. Dysregulated neutrophil activity plays a critical role in sepsis-induced organ failure through interactions with the vascular endothelial cells during forward and reverse migration, resulting in vascular barrier disruption and increased neutrophil trafficking into vital organs. Therapeutic approaches for treating sepsis are mainly supportive. Due to limited clinical translation from rodent models, complexity of the pathophysiology, and most importantly, the heterogenous nature of sepsis, no significant therapeutics have been successfully developed to address the underlying immune dysregulation. In this review, we will discuss the important gap in knowledge on the fundamental mechanisms of neutrophil-endothelial interaction, the role that neutrophil forward and reverse migration plays in organ damage in sepsis, and how neutrophil and endothelial cell heterogeneity impact cell-cell communication. We will explore emerging methodologies, including novel omic and microphysiological systems, to study the underlying mechanism of neutrophil-endothelial interaction and neutrophil forward migration/reverse migration. Finally, we will review potential therapeutic targets modulating neutrophil-endothelial interaction and the challenges of translating them from bench to bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.