Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972533›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Evolution of Methods for the Quantitative Assessment of Inbreeding in Livestock.

Lyubov Getmantseva, Siroj Bakoev, Maria Kolosova, Alexandr Usatov, Kharon Amerkhanov, Olga Lukonina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lyubov GetmantsevaAll Russian Research Institute of Animal Breeding, Lesnye Polyany 141212, Russia.
Siroj BakoevAll Russian Research Institute of Animal Breeding, Lesnye Polyany 141212, Russia.
Maria KolosovaAll Russian Research Institute of Animal Breeding, Lesnye Polyany 141212, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-7108
Alexandr UsatovAcademy of Biology and Biotechnology Named After D.I. Ivanovsky, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia.
Kharon AmerkhanovInstitute of Animal Science and Biology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Agricultural Academ Named After K.A. Timiryazev, Moscow 127434, Russia.
Olga LukoninaAll Russian Research Institute of Animal Breeding, Lesnye Polyany 141212, Russia.ORCID 0009-0004-5369-6555

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation 082-00066-26-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding is a quantitative measure of autozygosity that underlies the assessment of genetic risks and the management of genetic progress in livestock populations. The development of methods for its estimation reflects a transition from probabilistic pedigree-based models to the direct analysis of genome structure. This review systematizes the evolution of approaches to inbreeding assessment-from the classical inbreeding coefficient F based on identity by descent (IBD) to marker-based, segment-based runs of homozygosity (ROH) and probabilistic homozygous-by-descent (HBD) models. It is shown that the coefficients F_ped, F_GRM, F_ROH, and F_HBD capture related but distinct aspects of autozygosity and are therefore not fully interchangeable. Particular attention is paid to the transition from integral indicators to spatially and temporally stratified analyses of autozygosity, enabling the differentiation between ancient and recent inbreeding. Methodological assumptions, limitations, and the sensitivity of various approaches to marker density, detection parameters, and population demographic structure are discussed. A comparative analysis of methods for calculating F_ROH and segment-based autozygosity is presented. The necessity of a comprehensive assessment of inbreeding and the standardization of analytical protocols for its application in modern breeding programs is substantiated.

Indexed as

autozygosityHBDIBDinbreedinglivestockpedigreeROH

Identifiers

PMID41972533
PMCPMC13072426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.