ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026
Impact of Bristle Hardness of Manual Toothbrushes on the Cleaning Efficacy of Teeth with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the influence of bristle hardness (soft or medium) and simulated aging of manual toothbrushes on the cleaning efficacy in teeth with fixed orthodontic appliances. MATERIALS AND
methodsBrackets were attached to black resin teeth coated with a layer of titanium dioxide and brushed using a soft and medium toothbrush. Two different brushing motions, horizontal and circular, were tested. After every brushing session, the percentage of cleaned areas was measured to evaluate the cleaning performance. Brushing with the respective toothbrushes on a 3D-printed typodont with brackets and wire was performed to simulate the aging of the brush. Cleaning performance was reassessed after simulated periods of two, four and six months. Statistical analysis was performed at baseline and after six months of simulated use, using beta regression and pairwise comparisons.
resultsToothbrushes with softer bristles consistently cleaned more effectively than harder ones, regardless of brushing motion (p 0.0001, respectively). At all timepoints, horizontal brushing was also more effective than circular brushing. The cleaning performance for all bristle types and brushing motions improved over the test period.
conclusionSofter bristles consistently outperformed harder ones, indicating potential benefits for patients with orthodontic appliances. While horizontal brushing was more effective than circular motions, the direct application to clinical settings is limited due to the complexity of in-vivo toothbrush wear and individual brushing habits. Nonetheless, the choice of softer bristles and horizontal brushing techniques may increase the cleaning efficacy on orthodontic appliances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.