ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elasmobranch nurseries often differ in environmental conditions, demographics, and use patterns. These differences affect the distribution of genetic variation among nurseries. However, conservation and management strategies often fail to account for such differences because they are difficult to characterize. We assessed differences in connectivity, genetic variation, and numbers of breeders among scalloped hammerheads (Sphyrna lewini) sampled in five nurseries in the western North Atlantic Ocean. We used a reduced-representation genomic approach to genotype 472 young of the year and small juveniles at 8,334 loci containing single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We inferred full- and half-sibling relationships and used mitochondrial genome haplotypes to differentiate between maternally and paternally related half-siblings. Among 45 sibling pairs detected, 91% were from the same nurseries and only four pairs were sampled in different nurseries, indicating strong site fidelity. Weak but significant genetic heterogeneity was detected among nurseries based on analysis of molecular variance (0.02% variation, F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.