ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Monitoring wildlife health for diseases with visible signs by integrating camera traps with marked individuals.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monitoring wildlife health for diseases with visible signs by integrating camera traps with marked individuals.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Insights into Wildlife Cancer and Conservation Strategies Under the One Health Framework.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring wildlife health is essential for conservation and management, wildlife and livestock welfare, and public health in a One Health framework. Yet, wildlife health monitoring often requires long-term fieldwork and intensive sampling, which can be costly or logistically challenging, especially for remote, rare, or elusive populations. To address these challenges, we evaluated the feasibility and utility of integrating camera traps with a marked subset of Nubian ibex (Capra nubiana) to monitor five diseases that produce visible signs. Over six consecutive years, we deployed 51 camera traps and monitored 43 uniquely identifiable individuals (25 males and 18 females). We estimated apparent prevalence annually and modeled temporal trends with generalized additive models, which allowed flexible nonlinear relationships between disease prevalence and time. To assess recurrence dynamics and mortality risk, we fitted joint frailty models that simultaneously estimated rates of recurrent disease events and survival while accounting for individual heterogeneity. Apparent prevalence ranged from 2% to 38% depending on disease and year. For the most prevalent disease, caseous lymphadenitis (CLA), prevalence was higher in males (β = 2.08, p = 0.041) and did not vary across years. Despite small sample size (n = 9), joint frailty models yielded epidemiologically meaningful inference. Recurrence of CLA was positively associated with mortality (association parameter
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.