ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Informal supply chains of wild meat from rural Amazonia and food security in an urban center.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Informal supply chains of wild meat from rural Amazonia and food security in an urban center.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iquitos, the most populated city in the Peruvian Amazon, is a hub in the regional supply chain of wild meat and supplies urban consumers. Studies on wild meat consumption have focused primarily on markets, limiting the scope of species considered to those that are economically valuable and potential inferences from those data. We conducted interviews with 1548 households in Iquitos across all four districts to assess wild meat consumption rates for 7831 people in those households. We used species- and source-specific conversion factors to estimate biomass consumed from different species and sources in the supply chain. We estimated that 1786 t (95% CI 636.48-3317.62) of wild mammal meat were consumed in 2019 in Iquitos, which is about 4.25 kg (95% CI 1.54-8.02) per person per year. Markets supplied 57.22% of all wild mammal meat, but 14.67% was purchased from other sources and 27.85% was not purchased. Paca (Cuniculus paca) and collared peccary (Dicotyles tajacu) were the most heavily consumed species, mostly from markets. The majority of meat from other species, such as the woolly monkey (Lagothrix lagotricha) and capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), was traded outside markets. Our results indicated that wild mammal consumption rates may be much higher in Iquitos than previously reported, likely because social connections accounted for about half of the supply chain; consumers are receiving wild meat as gifts or were hunting themselves. The breadth of mammal meat consumption demonstrates the contributions of hunting to the food security and economic stability of consumers in Iquitos and the potential for sustainable supply chains of some mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.