Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972249›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Involvement of the reticulospinal tract in the pathogenesis of spasticity after stroke and spinal cord injury.

Sachiko Lee-Hotta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sachiko Lee-HottaDivision of Creative Physical Therapy, Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity occurs due to central nervous system (CNS) injuries such as stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, or multiple sclerosis. Following CNS injury, spasticity does not appear immediately but emerges several days to weeks later and is believed to be the result of maladaptive changes due to neuroplastic alterations. Previously, research on the pathophysiology of spasticity has primarily focused on the spinal cord, leading to the elucidation of its mechanisms. Although the involvement of upper motor neurons has been suggested, definitive studies on the underlying pathophysiology have not been reported. In recent years, brainstem reticular formation has been identified as a region undergoing active plastic changes following a CNS injury. Although evidence remains limited and controversial, increasing numbers of studies suggest that plastic changes in brainstem reticular formation may be involved in the onset of spasticity. This review outlines the pathophysiological similarities and differences in spasticity between stroke and spinal cord injury, while summarizing recent studies on plastic changes in brainstem reticular formation and the onset of spasticity, including studies of humans and primates, as well as rodents. It organizes and examines the points of contention regarding the differences in outcomes between these two groups.

Indexed as

neuronal plasticityreticular formationreticulospinal tractspasticityspinal cord injurystroke

Identifiers

PMID41972249
PMCPMC13066259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.