ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Involvement of the reticulospinal tract in the pathogenesis of spasticity after stroke and spinal cord injury.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- T1 rhizotomy for post-stroke hand flexion spasticity: a preliminary report of 15 cases.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial-neuroimmune interfaces in post-stroke spasticity: from acute brain injury to chronic motor phenotypes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spasticity occurs due to central nervous system (CNS) injuries such as stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, or multiple sclerosis. Following CNS injury, spasticity does not appear immediately but emerges several days to weeks later and is believed to be the result of maladaptive changes due to neuroplastic alterations. Previously, research on the pathophysiology of spasticity has primarily focused on the spinal cord, leading to the elucidation of its mechanisms. Although the involvement of upper motor neurons has been suggested, definitive studies on the underlying pathophysiology have not been reported. In recent years, brainstem reticular formation has been identified as a region undergoing active plastic changes following a CNS injury. Although evidence remains limited and controversial, increasing numbers of studies suggest that plastic changes in brainstem reticular formation may be involved in the onset of spasticity. This review outlines the pathophysiological similarities and differences in spasticity between stroke and spinal cord injury, while summarizing recent studies on plastic changes in brainstem reticular formation and the onset of spasticity, including studies of humans and primates, as well as rodents. It organizes and examines the points of contention regarding the differences in outcomes between these two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.