ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Retained Guidewire Following Bedside Femoral Venous Catheterization: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retained Guidewire Following Bedside Femoral Venous Catheterization: A Case Report.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retained guidewire after central venous catheterization (CVC) placement is a rare but preventable complication. Despite advances in ultrasound-guided catheterization and procedural safety, guidewire retention continues to be reported and may result in vascular injury, thrombosis, embolization, arrhythmia, or infection. We report the case of a 62-year-old male who underwent ascending aorta and total arch replacement for acute type I aortic dissection. On postoperative Day 11, a hemodialysis catheter was inserted into the right femoral vein under ultrasound guidance for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Sequential radiographs obtained within hours demonstrated cranial migration of a retained guidewire from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the internal jugular vein (IJV); however, the finding was initially misinterpreted as an imaging artifact. The guidewire was recognized ~24 h after insertion and successfully retrieved percutaneously in the angiography suite using a 6-Fr loop snare under fluoroscopic guidance. Completion venography confirmed intact removal without vascular injury or immediate complication. Although the patient later developed an aorto-esophageal fistula and died of septic shock on postoperative Day 86, there was no clinical or radiologic evidence linking the retained guidewire or its retrieval to the cause of death. This case highlights the potential for rapid intravascular migration, the risk of radiographic misinterpretation, and the necessity of structured "wire-out" verification before flushing or securing CVCs, even when ultrasound guidance is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.