ArticlePain reports2026
Association of widespread pain and peak alpha frequency cannot be isolated to a single network.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peak alpha frequency (PAF), an electroencephalography measure, has gained interest due to its association to pain-related neural processes in both healthy and clinical populations. In healthy groups, PAF derived from the sensorimotor component has strongly correlated with pain sensitivity, but in patient populations, only channel-based methods such as the global average and regions of interest have been investigated. Therefore, the specific role of component-based PAF such as the sensorimotor component and how it compares with channel-based methods remains undefined in chronic pain. Objective: To evaluate the performance of multiple spatial variations of PAF in distinguishing between widespread and localized chronic pelvic pain. Methods: This secondary analysis included 38 individuals with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome and were categorized as having widespread (n = 24) or localized (n = 14) pain based on self-reported body maps. Resting-state electroencephalography data were collected, and 4 types of spatial variations were used: global average, region of interest, sensorimotor component, and group independent component analysis. Results: Both the global average and region of interest-based PAF had significantly lower average PAF among individuals in the widespread compared with localized pain groups. There was no significant difference for the sensorimotor component or group independent component analysis-component PAF. Channel-based methods had larger effect sizes compared with the component-based methods when explaining differences in PAF between pain groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that chronic widespread pain is associated with widely distributed changes in cortical function that cannot be captured in a single component, indicating that it affects multiple distinct neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.