ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2026
Assessment of the feed additive consisting of coated granulated calcium iodate anhydrous for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (DOX-AL ITALIA SPA).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of the feed additive consisting of coated granulated calcium iodate anhydrous for all animal species for the renewal of its authorisation (DOX-AL ITALIA SPA).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of coated granulated calcium iodate anhydrous as nutritional feed additive for all animal species. The additive is already authorised for use with all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive under assessment complies with the conditions of the authorisation. In addition, a modification in the manufacturing process (i.e. addition of 0.2% sepiolite) is proposed. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) confirms that the calcium iodate component of the additive remains safe for the target species under the approved conditions. However, due to the absence of adequate data on some of the coating agents used in the manufacture of the additive, the Panel cannot conclude on the safety of coated granulated calcium iodate anhydrous for the target species and the environment. Due to the lack of adequate iodine deposition data and information on the safety of some of the coating agents listed by the applicant, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the consumer. With regard to the safety for the users, the additive is not considered irritant to skin or eyes; however, it should be considered as a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Exposure of users by any route is considered a risk and should be minimised. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive is an efficacious source of iodine in feed for all animal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.