ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Neurotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacovigilance signals of dupilumab among pediatric patients: A real‑world analysis based on the FAERS database.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- Adverse event reporting signals for SGLT-2 inhibitor-metformin combination therapy: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), an antitumor therapeutic strategy, have shown great potential for cancer treatment. With the widespread use of ICIs, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have increased gradually. Neurotoxicity, as an irAE, has a low incidence rate, but high disability and mortality rates, warranting clinical attention. Material and methods: This study aimed to quantify the association between neurological adverse events and ICI treatment and describe the characteristics of ICI-related neurological complications in real-world practice. Data were sourced from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2025. Data mining was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method. Classification and statistics were conducted using the system organ class (SOC), high-level group term (HLGT), and preferred term (PT) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology set (version 28.0). Results: The entire FAERS database included 56,321,150 adverse event records, of which 26,629 records were identified as being related to neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) following ICI therapy. The main adverse events include encephalitis, encephalopathy, myasthenia gravis, paraneoplastic syndromes, and peripheral neuropathy. Among these reports, males (53.51%) outnumbered females (37.82%), and the median patient age was 67 years. The number of reports in 2024 was slightly higher than that in other years, but the difference was not significant. Physicians were the primary reporters (43.23%) and the United States had the highest number of reports (35.78%). The median time to the onset of adverse events was 30 days. Serious reports accounted for a high proportion of the patients (91.23%). Conclusion: Pharmacovigilance analysis indicated that neurological immune-related adverse events associated with ICIs mainly involved central nervous system inflammation and neuromuscular junction dysfunction. Different ICI immunotherapies are associated with distinct neurological disease characteristics, and combination therapies may influence the reporting patterns of neurotoxicity. In clinical practice, the early recognition and management of ICI-related n-irAEs are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.