ArticleJournal of aging research2026
Association Between Neck Circumference, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Relative Muscle Strength in Older Women.
Article in Journal of aging research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Neck Circumference, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Relative Muscle Strength in Older Women.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neck circumference (NC) has been proposed as a potential anthropometric marker of cardiovascular risk, but its relationship with functional capacity in older women remains unclear. Objective: To analyze the association between NC, cardiovascular indicators, and functional capacity in older women. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with 64 postmenopausal women aged over 60 years. Participants were stratified into two groups according to NC values < 33.5 cm ( Results: Older women with NC ≥ 33.5 cm presented higher body mass, body mass index, waist circumference, sum of skinfolds, and diastolic blood pressure. Relative muscle strength was lower in this group, with effect sizes suggesting a meaningful difference. No consistent differences were observed between groups in sit to stand, biceps curl, TUG, and 6MWT performance. NC was positively associated with cardiovascular risk markers and inversely associated with relative muscle strength, indicating a consistent pattern of association. Conclusion: Older women with higher NC values showed greater cardiovascular risk and lower relative muscle strength, but no difference in functional test performance (sit to stand, biceps curl, TUG, and 6MWT performance). These findings support NC as a practical and low-cost anthropometric indicator of cardiovascular risk in older women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.