ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2026
Ultrasound of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To review the anatomy, biomechanics, ultrasound technique, and imaging features of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, and to highlight the role of ultrasound relative to MRI in evaluating syndesmotic injuries. Methods: A literature-based narrative review was performed, focusing on normal and pathologic ultrasound findings of the syndesmotic ligaments and their MRI correlation. Results: The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament is the most commonly visualized and injured structure. It is best seen in an oblique axial plane, extending from the tibial to the fibular tubercle. It appears as a thin, well-defined, fibrillar, echogenic band crossing the syndesmotic interval. The posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament is best seen posteriorly, slightly deeper and thicker, extending between the posterior tibia and fibula. Ultrasound examination of acute ligament injury shows ligament thickening, loss of normal fibrillar pattern, fiber discontinuity, or the presence of small, avulsed bone fragments. Ultrasound of chronic ligament injury shows thinning, irregularity, or heterogeneous scarring. Hypoechoic fibrotic changes or calcification at insertion sites can also be seen. Ultrasound provides high-resolution, real-time imaging capable of detecting ligament tears and assessing tibiofibular instability under stress. Dynamic ultrasound demonstrates good correlation with MRI for identifying acute syndesmotic disruptions, particularly in athletic or acute trauma settings. Conclusion: Ultrasound is a valuable and accessible modality for evaluating distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. It complements MRI by providing immediate, functional assessment, aiding in timely diagnosis and management of high ankle sprains. Ultrasound should be considered in the imaging algorithm for suspected syndesmotic injuries, especially in sports and trauma settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.