ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2026
Ultrasound imaging of small peripheral nerves - a primer for radiologists.
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-resolution imaging has transformed the evaluation of small superficial peripheral nerves, enabling earlier detection of neuropathies, traumatic injuries, and entrapments. Among available modalities, ultrasound is particularly well suited for this purpose owing to its high spatial resolution, dynamic assessment capabilities, and ability to guide interventions. Normal nerves can be recognized on ultrasound by their fascicular architecture and characteristic honeycomb appearance, which helps distinguish them from adjacent tendons, vessels, and connective tissue. High-frequency transducers allow improved delineation of fascicular detail, while small-footprint probes enable imaging of nerves in anatomically constrained regions, establishing ultrasound as a reliable and cost-effective tool for evaluating peripheral nerve injuries. Because of spatial resolution limitations, magnetic resonance imaging has restricted ability to evaluate submillimeter-sized nerves; high-resolution ultrasound is therefore particularly effective in localizing pathological nerves - both in terms of the exact site of involvement and the length of the affected segment. This review article highlights in detail the sonographic techniques, pitfalls, and key anatomic landmarks for visualizing small peripheral nerves in the upper and lower extremities, with particular emphasis on nerves that are frequently under-evaluated in routine clinical practice yet often contribute to allodynia. Normal anatomical appearance on ultrasound is provided for better understanding along with examples of pathologies affecting these nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.