ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Radiomic analysis of medical imaging for classification in oncology and recommendations for clinically initiated research: a literature review.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Endometriosis Imaging: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Emerging Evidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Radiomics is a thriving field that aims to enhance clinical decision-making by enabling the noninvasive, quantitative characterization of lesions on medical images. Despite thousands of studies being published in this field, the adaptation of radiomics in routine clinical practice remains challenging due to the complexity of analytical steps and issues in reproducibility. The goal of this review was to facilitate translation by bridging the gap between radiomics research and clinical applications in oncology. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of major databases for literature on the application of radiomics to clinical classification in oncology published from January 1, 2005, to November 30, 2025. We reviewed eligible articles, summarized and discussed their content, and provided recommendations for each step of the radiomic analysis workflow. Key Content and Findings: The literature review generated 13 key recommendations for improving the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of radiomic models for disease characterization in clinical oncology. These recommendations covered important aspects, including data quality assurance, robust feature selection techniques, open data, and model sharing. Conclusions: By considering these recommendations, researchers and clinicians may improve the clinical applicability of radiomics, aiding its gradual incorporation into routine practice in oncology. The integration of radiomics into clinical settings holds the potential to enhance patient care and contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.