Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972074›Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Radiomic analysis of medical imaging for classification in oncology and recommendations for clinically initiated research: a literature review.

Kaijing Mao, Lun Matthew Wong, Kuo Feng Hung, Rongli Zhang, Walter Y H Lam, Zhiyi Shan, Tiffany Y So, Qi Yong Hemis Ai, Kyongtae Ty Bae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaijing MaoRestorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Lun Matthew WongDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Kuo Feng HungApplied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Rongli ZhangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Walter Y H LamRestorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhiyi ShanPaediatric Dentistry & Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tiffany Y SoDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Qi Yong Hemis AiDepartment of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Kyongtae Ty BaeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Radiomics is a thriving field that aims to enhance clinical decision-making by enabling the noninvasive, quantitative characterization of lesions on medical images. Despite thousands of studies being published in this field, the adaptation of radiomics in routine clinical practice remains challenging due to the complexity of analytical steps and issues in reproducibility. The goal of this review was to facilitate translation by bridging the gap between radiomics research and clinical applications in oncology. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted of major databases for literature on the application of radiomics to clinical classification in oncology published from January 1, 2005, to November 30, 2025. We reviewed eligible articles, summarized and discussed their content, and provided recommendations for each step of the radiomic analysis workflow. Key Content and Findings: The literature review generated 13 key recommendations for improving the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of radiomic models for disease characterization in clinical oncology. These recommendations covered important aspects, including data quality assurance, robust feature selection techniques, open data, and model sharing. Conclusions: By considering these recommendations, researchers and clinicians may improve the clinical applicability of radiomics, aiding its gradual incorporation into routine practice in oncology. The integration of radiomics into clinical settings holds the potential to enhance patient care and contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine.

Indexed as

clinical applicationmedical imageRadiomic analysistumor classification

Identifiers

PMID41972074
PMCPMC13066887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.