ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Influence of slice thickness on computed tomography perfusion-derived ischemic core volume accuracy in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT) perfusion enables quantitative assessment of cerebral hemodynamic and physiologic parameters and is widely employed for triaging patients with acute ischemic stroke; however, the absence of standardized acquisition protocols for ischemic core estimation remains a major limitation. This study aimed to determine the optimal CT slice thickness for quantifying ischemic core volume derived from CT perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke, using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-derived ischemic core volume as the reference standard. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with acute ischemic stroke who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. CT perfusion data were reconstructed with slice thicknesses of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm to evaluate their impact on ischemic core volume quantification. Ischemic core volumes were calculated using fully automated post-processing software. The ischemic core was defined using thresholds of relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) <20-38% and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) <34-42%. The optimal slice thickness was identified based on the lowest mean absolute error (MAE), the smallest bias and narrowest 95% limits of agreement (LoA) in Bland-Altman analysis, and the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) compared with DWI-derived ischemic core volume. Results: A total of 87 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 69.64±12.27 years; 49 males) were included. Among the different slice thicknesses, the lowest MAE was observed at the rCBF <38% threshold compared to rCBF <30%. Bland-Altman analysis and ICC results indicated that 3 mm (bias, 5.04 mL; 95% LoA, -35.29 to 45.38; ICC =0.961), 5 mm (bias, 4.55 mL; 95% LoA, -37.41 to 46.51; ICC =0.961), and 7 mm (bias, 4.75 mL; 95% LoA, -35.14 to 44.66; ICC =0.961) slice thicknesses yielded the most accurate estimates of ischemic core volume when using rCBF <38%. In contrast, 1 mm (bias, 6.71 mL; 95% LoA, -36.86 to 50.29; ICC =0.951) and 10 mm (bias, 9.12 mL; 95% LoA, -47.42 to 65.67; ICC =0.905) reconstructions demonstrated lower agreement with DWI-derived measurements. Conclusions: CT perfusion data reconstructed at slice thicknesses of 3-7 mm provided the most accurate estimation of ischemic core volume, at both commonly used and optimal perfusion thresholds, compared with thinner (1 mm) or thicker (10 mm) slice thicknesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.