ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
An interpretable weighted ensemble based on routinely collected clinical data for the accurate prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is a primary prognostic indicator in breast cancer, yet conventional surgical staging for determining ALN status is invasive. We aimed to develop an interpretable, noninvasive weighted ensemble model for ALN metastasis prediction using only routine, universally accessible clinicopathological data. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 915 patients (training set: n=732; test set: n=183). Twelve routine clinicopathological variables, including age, tumor diameter, histological grade, and biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67], served as predictors. A two-stage weighted ensemble was developed through the integration of logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) via Python version 3.9. Model performance was evaluated with the held-out test set according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and sensitivity. Model interpretability was achieved through Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: The weighted ensemble model achieved a superior AUC of 0.762 on the test set, outperforming optimized XGBoost (AUC =0.752) and tuned LR (AUC =0.741). The model demonstrated a robust AUPRC of 0.575 and achieved a high sensitivity of 0.800. SHAP analysis revealed that model predictions were primarily driven by tumor diameter, invasive ductal carcinoma pathology type, and plateau time-intensity curve patterns. Conclusions: The interpretable weighted ensemble model, based only on standard tabular clinicopathological data, provides accurate and transparent ALN risk stratification. Its high sensitivity supports its use as a valuable triage tool for identifying low-risk patients who may safely forego invasive axillary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.