ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Factors predicting the risk of breast cancer: construction and validation of a nomogram model.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A simple and practicable strategy for predicting the risk of breast cancer (BC) urgently needs to be established. This study aimed to construct a nomogram model based on age and ultrasound (US) features to predict BC. Methods: Consecutive adult females with a breast mass who underwent breast US followed by biopsy or surgery (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories III-V) or who received follow-up US more than 6 months after the initial US (BI-RADS category II) from August 2020 to November 2023 were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study. The participants were allocated to three groups (the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set). A logistic regression analysis of the training set was performed to identify the independent variables associated with BC, based on which the breast nomogram model (B-NM) was constructed. The performance of the B-NM was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration diagrams. Results: The training set comprised 306 females (43.0±11.9 years), the internal validation set comprised 45 females (46.0±12.6 years), and the external validation set comprised 114 females (40.6±11.4 years). Age and four US variables (mass size, orientation, margin, and vascularity) were found to be independently associated with BC. The B-NM combining these variables demonstrated relatively good performance {AUC [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.914 (0.882-0.946) Conclusions: The B-NM incorporating age and US variables demonstrated favorable discrimination and calibration in predicting the risk of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.