Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972057›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Factors predicting the risk of breast cancer: construction and validation of a nomogram model.

Tong Ren, Rong Huang, Weijun Xiao, Xiaoping Huang, Jingting Yan, Qiao Ji, Yihua Song, Yanan Guo, Xiang Li, Mo Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tong Ren *Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Rong Huang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6466-0782
Weijun XiaoClinical Medical Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoping HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Dongguan Songshan Lake Tungwah Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Jingting YanDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Hengyang Central Hospital Affiliated, Hunan Normal University, Hengyang, China.
Qiao JiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yihua SongDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanan GuoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Mo YangDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Zuofeng Xu *Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Fengping Liang *Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-0701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A simple and practicable strategy for predicting the risk of breast cancer (BC) urgently needs to be established. This study aimed to construct a nomogram model based on age and ultrasound (US) features to predict BC. Methods: Consecutive adult females with a breast mass who underwent breast US followed by biopsy or surgery (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories III-V) or who received follow-up US more than 6 months after the initial US (BI-RADS category II) from August 2020 to November 2023 were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study. The participants were allocated to three groups (the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set). A logistic regression analysis of the training set was performed to identify the independent variables associated with BC, based on which the breast nomogram model (B-NM) was constructed. The performance of the B-NM was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration diagrams. Results: The training set comprised 306 females (43.0±11.9 years), the internal validation set comprised 45 females (46.0±12.6 years), and the external validation set comprised 114 females (40.6±11.4 years). Age and four US variables (mass size, orientation, margin, and vascularity) were found to be independently associated with BC. The B-NM combining these variables demonstrated relatively good performance {AUC [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.914 (0.882-0.946) Conclusions: The B-NM incorporating age and US variables demonstrated favorable discrimination and calibration in predicting the risk of BC.

Indexed as

breast cancer (BC)Nomogrampredictingultrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID41972057
PMCPMC13066840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.