ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Comparative analysis of right atrial function in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance-feature tracking.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the importance of right atrial (RA) function is being increasingly acknowledged, comparative studies investigating RA dysfunction in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remain limited. This study aimed to compare RA function between ARVC and DCM using cardiac magnetic resonance-feature tracking (MR-FT). Methods: This retrospective study (June 2018 to December 2022) included 38 patients with ARVC, 98 patients with DCM, and 72 sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HC). RA deformation parameters, including RA reservoir strain (εs), conduit strain (εe), and booster strain (εa), as well as RA peak positive strain rate (SRs), peak early negative strain rate (SRe), and peak late negative strain rate (SRa), were assessed using the MR-FT technique. Group differences in RA deformation parameters were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. Pearson and Spearman correlation methods were performed to explore the correlation between RA deformation parameters and RA emptying fractions (RAEFs). Results: Patients with ARVC exhibited greater right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volumes than those with DCM (P<0.001). Compared with HC, both ARVC and DCM patient cohorts had lower RA εs {49.5%±14.4% Conclusions: Despite the more pronounced RV dilation in patients with ARVC, those with DCM exhibited significantly greater impairment in RA function with lower MR-FT-derived RA strain and SR values. ARVC and DCM showed different pathological patterns in RA dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.