Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972033›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Combining 3D iterative image reconstruction and deep learning to improve image quality of knee joint MRI fast sequences: a focus on meniscal injury evaluation.

Chao Peng, Fei Yu, Huan Liu, Hang Yin, Ying Huang, Zhenjiang Chang, Junbang Feng, Chuanming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chao Peng *Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Fei Yu *Medical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Huan LiuMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Hang YinMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Ying HuangMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Zhenjiang ChangMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Junbang FengMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Chuanming LiMedical Imaging Department, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knee joint diseases such as meniscal injuries are highly prevalent, affecting over 100 million people worldwide and impairing mobility and quality of life. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for diagnosing meniscal injuries due to its non-invasiveness, multi-parametric imaging, and excellent tissue contrast. However, conventional knee MRI sequences [T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and proton density-weighted imaging (PDWI)] on 1.5 T scanners require 7-9 minutes, reducing equipment efficiency and causing patient discomfort or motion artifacts. Accelerated techniques such as GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partial Parallel Acquisition (GRAPPA) shorten scan time but compromise image quality [e.g., reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), increased artifacts]. This study aimed to investigate whether a hybrid pipeline combining three-dimensional (3D) iterative reconstruction and deep learning (DL) improves image quality of fast knee MRI while maintaining diagnostic performance for meniscal injuries via Stoller grading. Methods: This retrospective study included 116 patients with suspected knee lesions (53 males, 63 females; mean age 53.7±16.9 years). All underwent conventional T1WI and PDWI, and accelerated sequences (GRAPPA factor: T1WI =3, PDWI =2). Accelerated data were processed with standard GRAPPA reconstruction ('Fast' group) and with a commercial software (iQMR™) integrating iterative reconstruction and a DL enhancement module ('After Processing' group). Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated overall image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively compared. Meniscal injuries were graded using the Stoller classification. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using weighted Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Scan times for fast T1WI and PDWI were reduced by 66.3% (from 92 to 31 s, P<0.001) and 66.5% (from 158 to 53 s, P<0.001), respectively. The 'After Processing' group showed significantly higher qualitative image quality scores compared to the 'Fast' group (P<0.05), and was comparable to conventional sequences. Quantitatively, SNR in the 'After Processing' group was significantly improved over the 'Fast' group (e.g., Patellar cartilage T1WI-SNR: 84.9 Conclusions: The hybrid 3D iterative reconstruction and DL pipeline significantly improves image quality of accelerated knee MRI, achieving a ~66% scan time reduction while maintaining SNR/CNR and diagnostic consistency with conventional sequences. This approach enhances workflow efficiency and optimizes healthcare resource utilization, supporting its clinical application.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)fast sequenceimage qualityknee magnetic resonance imaging (knee MRI)Three-dimensional iterative image reconstruction (3D iterative image reconstruction)

Identifiers

PMID41972033
PMCPMC13066897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.