ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
High-frequency energy fusion (HFEF) for nuclei segmentation with boundary-aware loss.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate nuclei segmentation in histopathological images is essential for quantitative pathology analysis but remains challenging due to nuclei clustering, morphological heterogeneity and weak or discontinuous boundaries. Although transformer-based models improve global context modeling, explicit enhancement of boundary-related features and effective suppression of false negatives (FNs) along nuclei edges are still limited. This study aimed to develop a boundary-enhanced nuclei segmentation framework by integrating high-frequency energy fusion (HFEF) with a sensitivity-aware loss. Methods: We propose an HFEF framework that enhances nuclei boundary representation by integrating high-frequency components derived from the stationary wavelet transform (SWT) with Laplacian filtering. The resulting high-frequency energy map is fused as an additional input channel to enrich edge-related features in transformer-based segmentation models. In addition, a sensitivity-tuned loss (ST-Loss) is introduced to dynamically penalize low-confidence FNs, particularly in boundary regions. The proposed method was implemented in two edge-aware Swin Transformer-based segmentation models and evaluated with three publicly available histopathology and microscopy datasets. Performance was assessed using region-based metrics [Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU)] and boundary-aware metrics [Hausdorff distance (HDF) and boundary F1 score (BF1)]. Statistical significance was evaluated using paired one-tailed t-tests. Results: Across three datasets and two model architectures, HFEF consistently improved nuclei segmentation performance compared with baseline configurations. DSC and IoU increased by 1.07% and 2.20%, respectively (P<0.05). Boundary delineation was substantially improved, with a 27% reduction in average HDF and a 0.89% increase in BF1. Incorporation of ST-Loss further increased recall by 2.48% (P=0.005), indicating effective suppression of boundary-related FNs. Visual inspection confirmed sharper nuclei boundaries and fewer missed detections, particularly in clustered and overlapping nuclei. Conclusions: The proposed HFEF framework, combined with sensitivity-aware loss optimization, enhances nuclei boundary representation and reduces false-negative errors, leading to improved segmentation accuracy and boundary precision. This approach is model-agnostic and has potential applicability to medical image segmentation tasks where accurate boundary delineation is critical. Source code is available at: https://github.com/deep-geo/HFEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.