Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972025›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

High-frequency energy fusion (HFEF) for nuclei segmentation with boundary-aware loss.

Wenyang Yin, Wei He, Bing Shang, Bing Zhao, Xuening Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenyang YinShanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei HeCollege of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bing ShangData Science, AI and Digital Business, GISMA University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-1787
Bing ZhaoChina Academy of Railway Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuening WuCollege of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate nuclei segmentation in histopathological images is essential for quantitative pathology analysis but remains challenging due to nuclei clustering, morphological heterogeneity and weak or discontinuous boundaries. Although transformer-based models improve global context modeling, explicit enhancement of boundary-related features and effective suppression of false negatives (FNs) along nuclei edges are still limited. This study aimed to develop a boundary-enhanced nuclei segmentation framework by integrating high-frequency energy fusion (HFEF) with a sensitivity-aware loss. Methods: We propose an HFEF framework that enhances nuclei boundary representation by integrating high-frequency components derived from the stationary wavelet transform (SWT) with Laplacian filtering. The resulting high-frequency energy map is fused as an additional input channel to enrich edge-related features in transformer-based segmentation models. In addition, a sensitivity-tuned loss (ST-Loss) is introduced to dynamically penalize low-confidence FNs, particularly in boundary regions. The proposed method was implemented in two edge-aware Swin Transformer-based segmentation models and evaluated with three publicly available histopathology and microscopy datasets. Performance was assessed using region-based metrics [Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU)] and boundary-aware metrics [Hausdorff distance (HDF) and boundary F1 score (BF1)]. Statistical significance was evaluated using paired one-tailed t-tests. Results: Across three datasets and two model architectures, HFEF consistently improved nuclei segmentation performance compared with baseline configurations. DSC and IoU increased by 1.07% and 2.20%, respectively (P<0.05). Boundary delineation was substantially improved, with a 27% reduction in average HDF and a 0.89% increase in BF1. Incorporation of ST-Loss further increased recall by 2.48% (P=0.005), indicating effective suppression of boundary-related FNs. Visual inspection confirmed sharper nuclei boundaries and fewer missed detections, particularly in clustered and overlapping nuclei. Conclusions: The proposed HFEF framework, combined with sensitivity-aware loss optimization, enhances nuclei boundary representation and reduces false-negative errors, leading to improved segmentation accuracy and boundary precision. This approach is model-agnostic and has potential applicability to medical image segmentation tasks where accurate boundary delineation is critical. Source code is available at: https://github.com/deep-geo/HFEF.

Indexed as

edge enhancementhistopathologyNuclei segmentationtransformerwavelet transform

Identifiers

PMID41972025
PMCPMC13066857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.