ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Transrectal biplane ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy for rectal and peri-rectal lesions: an 18-year retrospective analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of rectal and perirectal lesions remains challenging, particularly for submucosal, necrotic, or anatomically complex masses where conventional endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) often yields insufficient tissue. Transrectal biplane ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy (TRUSTPB) offers a potential alternative, but its diagnostic performance and safety in this setting require systematic evaluation. Methods: We conducted an 18-year retrospective study of 99 patients with rectal or perirectal lesions who underwent TRUSTPB at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between 2006 and 2020. Technical success, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and complication rates were assessed using final pathological diagnoses and long-term follow-up data. Diagnostic outcomes of TRUSTPB were compared with those of EFB. Associations between clinical variables (e.g., needle type, lesion size) and diagnostic yield were analyzed using Chi-squared tests and binary logistic regression. Results: TRUSTPB achieved a technical success rate of 96.0% (95/99). It demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (91.9%) and sensitivity (95.1%) for malignancy, with no false-positive cases. In contrast, EFB showed significantly lower detection rates, especially in submucosal or necrotic lesions. Core needle biopsy was associated with higher diagnostic yield than fine-needle aspiration (P<0.05), particularly for lesions >25 mm. All four failed biopsies involved small or complex lesions sampled with fine needles, yielding only acellular or necrotic material. No major complications occurred. Conclusions: TRUSTPB is a safe, real-time, and highly accurate technique for diagnosing rectal and perirectal lesions, outperforming conventional EFB in challenging cases. It represents a preferred approach for lesions inaccessible or nondiagnostic by standard colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.