ArticleLiver cancer2026
Impact of Age on Patient-Reported Outcomes with First-Line Camrelizumab plus Rivoceranib versus Sorafenib in Adults with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Post Hoc Analyses of the CARES-310 Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The CARES-310 randomized, open-label, international phase 3 trial reported improved overall survival and progression-free survival with camrelizumab-rivoceranib compared with sorafenib in adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of data from CARES-310 to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), survival, and safety in adults <65 years and ≥65 years. PRO endpoints included time to deterioration with a ≥10-point decrease from baseline of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), physical functioning, role functioning, and symptoms. Results: PRO data for these age cohorts demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits with camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib in key aspects of the patient experience such as HRQoL, functioning, pain, and fatigue. Similarly, both age groups had a significant survival outcome advantage on camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib. Although patients treated with camrelizumab-rivoceranib had higher rates of treatment-related adverse events versus sorafenib, this did not adversely affect HRQoL as assessed by PROs. The most common ≥20% grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib arm were hypertension and increased AST versus palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome in the sorafenib arm. Conclusion: These results support the favorable benefit-risk profile of camrelizumab-rivoceranib in patients <65 years and ≥65 years as a first-line therapy in patients with uHCC who have not received prior systemic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.