Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41972003›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Bursts of regional cortical inhibition during smartphone use.

Wenyu Wan, Arko Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenyu WanCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden 2333 AK, the Netherlands.
Arko GhoshCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden 2333 AK, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transient beta (β) bursts-brief neural events-are increasingly recognized for their role in motor and cognitive processes, yet their contribution to naturalistic behavior remains poorly understood. Smartphone behavior, involving continuous varied engagement, provides a rich real-world context to examine these dynamics. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) as participants interacted with their smartphones using their right thumb for ∼80 min. β-bursts were detected across the scalp, with bilateral sensorimotor electrodes accumulating more bursts than other electrodes. Brain-wide burst probability decreased before touchscreen touches and increased afterward, with the strongest modulation over left sensorimotor cortex. Touches occasionally occurred during bursts, but at lower rates over left sensorimotor regions than elsewhere. Separating touchscreen intervals with versus without bursts revealed an exaggerated difference in sensorimotor cortex: intervals containing bursts were longer. These patterns suggest that continuous smartphone touches are modulated by brief, spatially localized transient bursts that may gate motor execution in sensorimotor networks.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceBiomedical engineeringCognitive neuroscienceNeurosciencePsychology

Identifiers

PMID41972003
PMCPMC13068570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.