Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971984›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2026

PET rapid image reconstruction challenge (PETRIC).

Casper da Costa-Luis, Matthias J Ehrhardt, Christoph Kolbitsch, Evgueni Ovtchinnikov, Edoardo Pasca, Kris Thielemans, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Casper da Costa-LuisScience & Technology Facilities Council, UK Research & Innovation, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, United Kingdom.
Matthias J EhrhardtDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Christoph KolbitschPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.
Evgueni OvtchinnikovScience & Technology Facilities Council, UK Research & Innovation, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, United Kingdom.
Edoardo PascaScience & Technology Facilities Council, UK Research & Innovation, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, United Kingdom.
Kris ThielemansInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charalampos TsoumpasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We describe the foundation of PETRIC, an image reconstruction challenge to minimise the computational runtime of related algorithms for Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Purpose: Although several similar challenges are well-established in the field of medical imaging, there have been no prior challenges for PET image reconstruction. Methods: Participants were provided with open-source software for implementation of their reconstruction algorithm(s). We defined the objective function and reconstruct "gold standard" reference images, and provided metrics for quantifying algorithmic performance. We also received and curated phantom datasets (acquired with different scanners, radionuclides, and phantom types), which we further split into training and evaluation datasets. The automated computational framework of the challenge is released as open-source software. Results: Four teams with nine algorithms in total participated in the challenge. Their contributions made use of various tools from optimisation theory including preconditioning, stochastic gradients, and artificial intelligence. While most of the submitted approaches appear very similar in nature, their specific implementation lead to a range of algorithmic performance. Conclusion: As the first challenge for PET image reconstruction, PETRIC's solid foundations allow researchers to reuse its framework for evaluating new and existing image reconstruction methods on new or existing datasets. Variant versions of the challenge have and will continue to be launched in the future.

Indexed as

challengeimage reconstructioninverse problemsmedical imagingopen sourcepositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID41971984
PMCPMC13066283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.