ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Effect of Ozone on Adhesion of Pediatric Bioactive Restorative Materials
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of PVM/MA Copolymer on Dentin Bond Durability.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This Materials and Methods: Standardized enamel and dentin surfaces (n=96) from extracted human teeth were randomized into 8 groups which differ by the treatment protocol (no treatment, ozone gas, ozonated water, ozonated gel) and restorative material used (Fuji II LC, ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative). Adhesive performance was evaluated after 7 days of storage (HBSS, 37 °C) by shear bond strength (SBS) test and microscopic fracture mode analysis. Surface roughness (Sa) was measured by optical profilometry; interfacial elemental composition was analyzed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray detectors (SEM-EDX). Results: Ozone treatment did not significantly affect SBS (mean 3.59±3.23 MPa [min 0.05 MPa; max 11.69 MPa]), fracture modes, or surface roughness (p>0.05 for all domains). Chemical analyses revealed no appreciable difference, with the possible exception of minimal fluoride release. Conclusions: Regardless of the vector agent, ozone treatments showed no significant effect on the short-term adhesion capability of either restorative material, or on the bonding quality with enamel and dentin. Additionally, it seemed that they they neither affected the surface topography nor the possible bioactivity at the interface of the tested materials. However, these preliminary results are restricted to the specific experimental conditions adopted, and further studies are required before any definitive clinical recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.