ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Effect of Root Canal Drying Methods on Bioceramic Sealer Bond Strength.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study evaluated the effects of paper point drying, microsuction, and 70% isopropyl alcohol on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation of a premixed bioceramic sealer. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted maxillary central incisors were prepared using NiTi rotary instruments and irrigated with NaOCl and EDTA. Specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): paper point drying, microsuction, or 70% isopropyl alcohol. All canals were obturated with a calcium silicate-based bioceramic sealer using the single-cone technique. After one week of incubation, root slices from the coronal, middle, and apical thirds (n = 90) were subjected to push-out bond strength testing. Failure modes were evaluated stereomicroscopically, and selected specimens underwent scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests (α = 0.05). Results: The drying protocol significantly affected bond strength (p < 0.001). The isopropyl alcohol (3.23 MPa) and paper point (2.97 MPa) groups demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than the microsuction group (1.23 MPa). Apical slices showed higher bond strength than coronal and middle slices. Mixed failures predominated, while cohesive failures were more frequent in the alcohol and paper point groups. SEM revealed improved sealer-dentin adaptation with fewer interfacial gaps in these groups. Conclusions: Bioceramic sealer adhesion is strongly influenced by the drying method. Paper point drying and isopropyl alcohol enhance bond strength and interfacial adaptation, whereas microsuction results in inferior performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.