Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Resistance profiles of fastidious oral anaerobes and other periodontal species by multipoint inoculator: an

Alexandra Wolf, Alexander Indra, Florian Heger, Julia Reichl, Andreas Moritz, Apostolos Georgopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra WolfCore Facility for Oral Microbiology and Hygiene, University Dental Clinic, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander IndraAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Florian HegerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Julia ReichlAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Andreas MoritzUniversity Dental Clinic Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Apostolos GeorgopoulosCore Facility for Oral Microbiology and Hygiene, University Dental Clinic, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontal disease is one of the most prevalent chronic infections worldwide. Associations with systemic conditions, including endocarditis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and tumor progression, have been extensively investigated in recent studies. Furthermore, it involves pathogens that are often anaerobic, biofilm-associated, and difficult to treat owing to inherent resistance mechanisms and the protective nature of biofilms. As dentists prescribe a substantial proportion of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance is increasing globally, innovative diagnostic methods are urgently needed to ensure effective and sustainable antibiotic stewardship. In this study, anaerobic stock isolates from 30 to 35 frozen samples per genera or species were subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration testing. A multipoint inoculator was used to seed agar plates containing serial antibiotic dilutions, allowing assessment of five commonly used antibiotics: amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin. This enabled simultaneous testing of multiple strains under strictly anaerobic conditions, reducing the handling time and material consumption. Among the tested oral pathogens, high resistance levels were observed for clarithromycin. Amoxicillin (±clavulanic acid) remains the most reliable first-line option, whereas levofloxacin may serve as an alternative for certain gram negative anaerobes, when standard treatment protocols are unsuccessful. Mixed-inoculum experiments further showed altered antibiotic responses under biofilm-like conditions. The multipoint inoculator enables reliable testing of oxygen-sensitive anaerobes, including mixed biofilms. Clinical relevance: The presented method enables dental practitioners and laboratories to obtain resistance data from subgingival pathogens, especially in low- and middle-income countries or remote regions where access to centralized microbiology laboratories is limited. This benefits the wider healthcare system by supporting sustainable antibiotic stewardship through reliable, cost-effective resistance testing and the patients by facilitating the selection of an effective targeted agent, particularly in complex cases where multiple empirical antibiotic therapies have failed.

Indexed as

anaerobic bacteriaantibiotic resistancebiofilmMIC testingmultipointinoculatorperiodontal disease

Identifiers

PMID41971958
PMCPMC13062202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.