ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Antagonist Binding Actively Disrupts Interleukin-1 Receptor Dynamics to Block Co-receptor Recruitment.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (IL1R1) is a central regulator of inflammatory signaling and functions as a molecular switch, yet it remains unclear how agonists and antagonists that bind the same primary site produce opposite signaling outcomes. Available structural data define inactive and active endpoint conformations but do not explain how antagonist binding dynamically prevents co-receptor recruitment. Here, we combine all-atom molecular dynamics simulations with multiscale flexibility modeling using CABS-flex to systematically compare the intrinsic dynamics of IL1R1 across its unbound, agonist-bound, antagonist-bound, and co-receptor-bound states. Although both agonists and antagonists engage the same conserved interface on the D1/D2 domains, they induce fundamentally different dynamic responses in the receptor. Agonist binding progressively stabilizes interdomain coupling and promotes a stepwise transition toward a signaling-competent conformation. In contrast, antagonist binding selectively increases the flexibility of the distal D3 domain, particularly at the co-receptor binding interface, thereby preventing progression along the activation pathway. Importantly, the interaction patterns and dynamic signatures observed in the simulations are consistent with experimentally identified binding determinants, mutational data, and structural features associated with receptor activation and inhibition. These results demonstrate that IL1R1 antagonism is an active, allosteric, dynamics-driven process rather than a simple failure to stabilize an active conformation. Together, this work provides a mechanistic framework that reconciles existing structural and functional observations and highlights receptor dynamics as a key determinant of signaling control in the interleukin-1 system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.