ArticleAME case reports2026
Orbital complications in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series from a tertiary center hospital experience.
Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a non-invasive form of sinus inflammation characterized by immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated eosinophilic-rich type 1 hypersensitivity reaction. Although it is uncommon, many ophthalmic manifestations such as ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, double vision, and even visual loss can be seen in patients with AFRS due to direct optic nerve compression, immunological reaction to fungi, or other mechanisms. Case Description: In this case series, we reviewed four different cases of AFRS patients with orbital complications, reviewing their clinical and radiological features, and describing their management and outcomes. A variety of mechanisms have been described as the leading cause of visual complications in AFRS, such as optic nerve compression or allergic inflammatory reaction causing bony destruction. However, imaging and histopathological analysis play an important role in diagnosis. Despite the presence of orbital complications, endoscopic sinus surgery is still considered the first line of management in these conditions, as these four cases showed resolution of the disease with no recurrence after at least 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: The diagnosis of AFRS can be challenging and results in the presence of complications in those patients. This study described the importance of early recognition, diagnosis, and intervention of this disease to avoid the orbital complications and preserve the vision of patients and prevent any permanent complications. However, further studies are still needed in the future to identify the pattern of these complications in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.