ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Correction of deformity from convexity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Correction of scoliosis deformity from the convexity of the curve reduces the theoretical risk of neurovascular injury, a fact to be considered, especially in the paediatric population. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of this technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: This is a retrospective study, in which 50 patients with AIS were included. The minimum required follow-up was 24 months. After open posterior approach and flexibilisation of the deformity by facetectomies, pedicle screws were inserted 'free-hand' in the convexity and at the extremes of the assembly at the concavity level, with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Results: Fifty patients with AIS underwent surgery. The mean operative time was 251±50 min. Mean blood loss was 4.3±0.3 g/dL Hb. The mean postoperative stay was 6.3±0.3 days. A reduction of the Cobb angle was achieved in primary curve by 64.4% (from 53.0°±12.6° to 18.9°±9.5°; P<0.001) and in secondary curve by 47% (from 33.3°±11.4° to 17.5°±9.5°; P=0.005). Coronal balance changed from 3.6±1.9 to 2.3±4.2 mm (P=0.59) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) changed from -14.7±40 to -6.1±28.9 mm (P=0.10). There were no vascular complications. A single intraoperative neurophysiological event was recorded, requiring screw repositioning. Two wound infections were recorded. Conclusions: Correction of the deformity from the convexity using low-density constructs with pedicle screws, achieves similar results to other techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.