ArticleJTCVS techniques2026
Management of serious complications in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have shown robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) to be a safe alternative to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and its use has been widely adopted and continues to increase. However, there are a number of potential serious complications that necessitate conversion to thoracotomy. We reviewed our experience with the management and outcomes of such complications in a high-volume robotic center. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all major robotic resections (single surgeon, single center) performed between May 2018 and June 2025. Serious complications were defined as any major vascular or bronchial injury, erroneous transection, and any other event resulting in an extra procedure beyond the planned operation. Results: Between May 2018 and June 2025, a total of 1480 major RATS cases were performed. We identified 25 serious complications (17 intraoperative and 8 postoperative). Intraoperative complications included 13 major vascular injuries (including 1 transection of the main pulmonary artery requiring an arterial sleeve), 1 cardiac injury, and 3 bronchial injuries (1 occurring during intubation). Interestingly, these resulted in only 10 (59%) conversions to open surgery, with the rest managed robotically. There were no intraoperative deaths and 2 in-hospital deaths among patients with serious complications. Conclusions: RATS is safe and the risk of serious complications is low, and these complications do not always necessitate conversion. However, vigilance, understanding, and preparation for potential complications are key for surgeons as well as the entire robotic theater team. This ensures that complications can be dealt with efficiently and decisively, enhancing patient safety and optimizing surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.