ArticleFundamental research2026
Understand systemic risk from mangrove ecosystem through network analysis.
Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing the science of systemic environmental risk in an era of global change.Fundamental research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mangrove deforestation amplifies systemic risks by worsening extreme weather events, impeding socio-economic development, and exposing governance vulnerabilities. Yet, the extent to which mangrove dynamics-both loss and restoration-interact with climate, socio-economic, and governance systems to mitigate systemic risk remains underexplored. Drawing on the economic concept of "product space," we construct a Mangrove Multisystemic Risk Space, a network-based framework linking indicators across mangrove change, climate impacts, socio-economic development, and policy interventions. The network reveals a bipartite structure, with distinct clusters for mangrove loss and expansion, each surrounded by synergistic indicators. The mangrove loss cluster is tightly coupled with greenhouse gas emissions and climate extremes, while the expansion cluster aligns with renewable energy, economic growth, and population dynamics. Within this space, we identify two types of structurally significant indicators: "influential" (e.g., Ramsar site coverage) with high cascading potential, and "complex" indicators that require coordinated improvements across multiple dimensions, highlighting their systemic vulnerability. At the national level, the United States leads in achieving complex goals such as reducing extreme events, whereas New Zealand and Panama emerge as hubs of influential, well-performing indicators. These findings underscore the differentiated roles of mangrove-rich nations in mitigating systemic risk and call for strengthened global cooperation in mangrove conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.