Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971815›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2026

Altered soil nitrogen retention by grassland acidification from near-neutral to acidic conditions: A plant-soil-microbe perspective.

Baitao Gu, Ruzhen Wang, Jordi Sardans, Josep Peñuelas, Xingguo Han, Yong Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baitao GuErguna Forest-Steppe Ecotone Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Ruzhen WangErguna Forest-Steppe Ecotone Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Jordi SardansCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, 08913 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Josep PeñuelasCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, 08913 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Xingguo HanState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Yong JiangErguna Forest-Steppe Ecotone Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grassland ecosystems are facing soil acidification, occurring either rapidly or gradually, alongside the persistent threats of acid deposition and nitrogen (N) pollution. However, the understanding of how grassland soils retain N in response to acidification remains limited, despite its critical importance in providing essential services in these ecosystems. Considering the prevalence of near-neutral or weak-acidic (e.g., pH 6) soils in grasslands worldwide, we aim to predict the pathways through which grassland acidification alters soil N retention. Firstly, as soil fungal proportions increase, the carbon:nitrogen ratios of the microbial community also rise, leading to a downregulation of microbial N uptake and retention. Secondly, grassland acidification weakens the stability of soil organic matter (SOM) by physically and chemically dissolving its components, but also conserves SOM by hindering biological mineralization, thereby enhancing N retention. Thirdly, acidification damages 2:1 clay minerals and causes occupation of exchangeable positions by H

Indexed as

Grassland nitrogen cyclingMicrobial survival strategyPlant community compositionSoil acidificationSoil aggregateSoil organic matter

Identifiers

PMID41971815
PMCPMC13069627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.