SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026
Resting metabolic rate fluctuations across the menstrual cycle: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding resting metabolic rate fluctuations across menstrual cycle phases in healthy, naturally menstruating females. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published from January 2020 to September 2025. Of the 331 records identified, seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Results: Five studies reported a trend toward an elevated metabolic rate during the luteal phase, with four reporting statistically significant increases. The estimated increase ranged from approximately 30 to 120 kcal/day. Conclusion: However, the magnitude of this physiological shift appears to be small (approximately 3-5%) and may overlap with typical day-to-day biological variability, methodological limitations, or measurement error, potentially contributing to inconsistent findings across studies. Future research should prioritise longitudinal, repeated-measures designs with confirmed ovulation to accurately quantify menstrual cycle-related metabolic fluctuations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.