ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor-Blinded Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid for Improving Facial Skin Rejuvenation.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an injectable non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (NCHA) solution in improving facial skin appearance. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, no‑treatment-controlled, assessor-blinded, superiority clinical trial was conducted from December 2023 to July 2024 with 448 adults (224 per arm). The treatment group received full-face intradermal injections of NCHA (4 mL/session) at baseline, day 28, and day 56; the control group followed routine skincare and underwent the same injection protocol after day 84. The treatment group underwent skin hydration measurement, elasticity measurement (two objective assessments), global aesthetic improvement scale, skin roughness score, and fine line score (three subjective assessments) at baseline; day 28 and 56; and 7/14/28 days after the last injection (day 63/70/84). The control group completed the same assessments at baseline, 28, 56, 63, 70, and 84 days after randomization. Results: In the treatment group, 212 subjects (94.64%) completed the study, compared to 209 (93.3%) in the control group. Hydration increased steadily in the treatment group, exceeding that of the control at all post-treatment time points (P<0.001). Elasticity improvements at 7/14/28 days after the final injection were significantly greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). GAIS, ASRS, and AFLS all favored the treatment arm. Serious adverse events were not observed. Conclusion: Full‑face intradermal NCHA improved skin hydration, elasticity, texture, and fine lines with a favorable safety profile. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300078169.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.