SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
AI algorithms and IoT platforms for anomaly and failure prediction in industrial machinery-systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive Maintenance (PdM) focuses on anticipating potential failures in industrial machines by the monitoring key parameters. Artificial Intelligence (AI) provides algorithms that can be used for this purpose. Specialized literature mentions that some companies need to adopt more proactive and predictive strategies in managing of industrial maintenance. This study aims to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on Artificial Intelligence algorithms and software and IoT platforms used for anomaly and failure prediction. The method includes of six main phases: (i) defining the research questions; (ii) conducting a search process; (iii) establishing exclusion and inclusion criteria; (iv) performing a quality assessment of studies; (v) collecting data; and (vi) analyzing the data. The findings show that the main AI techniques for PdM are classified as: (i) machine Learning-based methods; (ii) neural networks-based methods; and (iii) knowledge transfer-based methods. Nine software and IoT technologies were identified to support maintenance operations. Additionally, it is discussed how Machine Learning and Deep Learning algorithms perform well in fault classification, prediction, Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimation, and diagnostic tasks. They can also be applied in earlier stages, such as data preprocessing and feature extraction. Finally, it is shown that knowledge transfer can improve AI algorithms when sudden changes occur in data and their relationships. In conclusion, the AI technologies identified can significantly contribute to predicting failures in industrial machinery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.