ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
GAN-based bone suppression using a combined loss function.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate analysis of chest radiographs (X-rays) is essential for diagnosing diseases such as pneumonia and lung cancer, yet bone structures often obscure critical soft tissues and lesions. From an artificial intelligence perspective, bone suppression can be formulated using different modeling paradigms that reflect distinct assumptions about the task. Methods: In this study, the problem is addressed as a comparative methodological investigation, and three conceptually different approaches are systematically evaluated within a unified experimental framework: denoising-based regression using autoencoders, structured image-to-image transformation using U-Net architectures, and distribution-based generative modeling using adversarial learning. In addition, the impact of different loss configurations and training regimes on reconstruction quality is examined. An enhanced generative adversarial network (GAN) with improved generator and discriminator components and a combined loss function (Wasserstein, L1, perceptual, and Sobel losses) is proposed to improve structural consistency and preserve soft-tissue appearance. Results: Model performance was assessed using the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the multi-scale structural similarity index measure (MS-SSIM). Among the evaluated approaches, the GAN achieved the best performance, reaching a PSNR of 44.09 dB and an MS-SSIM of 0.9968, and outperformed recently published methods evaluated on the same dataset. Discussion: These results highlight the importance of both modeling paradigm selection and loss formulation for achieving structurally consistent bone suppression in chest radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.