Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971600›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Nurse practitioners' implementation assessment in Swiss nursing homes: A mixed study protocol (the EVALIPS_VD Project).

Ricardo Salgado, Nishalini Gunalingam, Renée Dion, Hélène Chenevey-Antoine, Claudia Ortoleva Bucher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo SalgadoLa Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nishalini GunalingamFondation Belle Saison, Mont-sur-Rolle, Switzerland.
Renée DionFondation Pré Pariset, Pully, Switzerland.
Hélène Chenevey-AntoineHévivA - Association vaudoise des institutions médico-psycho-sociales, Renens, Switzerland.
Claudia Ortoleva BucherSchool of Health Sciences Fribourg, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Switzerland faces challenges in long-term care due to its high life expectancy and the resulting increased prevalence of non-communicable diseases and functional dependence among older adults. Nursing homes are addressing increasingly complex acute care needs amid healthcare professional shortages. The nurse practitioner role has emerged globally as a key strategy to enhance the accessibility, quality, and coordination of care in these settings. While the role was recently legislated in the canton of Vaud, there's a scarcity of solid scientific data on nurse practitioner implementation and impact in Switzerland. The aim of this study is to assess the implementation of the nurse practitioner role in nursing homes in order to develop a toolkit that supports the sustainability of this new role's deployment in Switzerland. Methods and analysis: This two-phase study will evaluate the implementation of the nurse practitioner role in two distinct nursing homes in the canton of Vaud, using the PEPPA Plus model (based on Donabedian's framework) as a guide. Phase 1 employs an embedded mixed-method case study design across three work packages (WPs). WP1 uses Rapid Ethnography (observations, interviews, document analysis) to assess structural elements influencing implementation before and one year after nurse practitioner deployment. WP2 uses a prospective descriptive quantitative design where NPs log their activities per act daily or five consecutive days each month over the course of one year. WP3 uses a longitudinal multi-method approach, combining a pre-post quasi-experimental quantitative component to measure resident, staff, and institutional outcomes (e.g., hospitalizations, pressure sores) at 3, 6, and 12 months, with qualitative interviews. Phase 2 (WP4) will use Thoele's three-step methodology-data preparation, focus group evaluation, and toolkit design-to develop a best practices toolkit to support the nurse practitioner role's sustainability based on Phase 1 results. For Phase 1 analysis, data from each nursing home will be analyzed separately (intra-case analysis) and then compared (inter-case analysis). Qualitative data (interviews) will be analyzed using thematic content analysis and triangulated with quantitative data for a comprehensive understanding. Quantitative outcomes will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized linear models (e.g., Poisson regression) for pre-post comparisons over two six-month periods. Ethics and dissemination: All procedures will comply with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the nature of the study, ethical approval from the Ethics Commission of the Canton of Vaud was not required, according to the latter. Data and material will be available on request from the authors. Trial registration number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7FX8M.

Indexed as

EvaluationImplementation scienceNurse practitionersNursing homes

Identifiers

PMID41971600
PMCPMC13068797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.